While great dramatically, and a successful transposition of the gangster archetype into the world of Japanese yakuza, the film is primordially a visual treat, if not for the gorgeously dignified black-and-white photography or elaborate sets, complete with erotic dancers and endless gunshot sounds, then for the actors' presence onscreen. With their slick classical look and nearly natural nobility, they make for a great trio of modern Robin Hood. As such, they become timeless genre archetypes, immovable heroes of urban mythologies and eternal staples of cinema itself. Their very presence in this attempt at rejuvenating the classic images of old is proof that they still belong, and probably always will belong to the silver screen.
**** A perfect example of the New Wave's reverence and dedication to the Hollywoodian excellence of old with a distinct Japanese flavor provided by local gangster etiquette and the importance of filial piety.
.........................
At once a very personal and universal story of separation, this hysterical exercise in over-acting is the pinnacle of raging modern expression. Involving highly intricate camerawork and a heavy dose of surrealistic imagery, it is a surprisingly sharp, passion-driven account of a couple's descent into madness on the back of a heated separation. But it is not a clean separation, and that is precisely where the shoe pinches, as there results a constantly hurtful brushing that gets progressively worst until the narrative goes completely overboard and into the realm of symbolism, slimy or otherwise. The end result is unique precisely because it reflects the director's very own experience in a very emotional way. It's like experiencing madness firsthand, as if being personally affected by the scourge of love and its necessary outcome, abandonment. Very powerful stuff.
Couple therapy at its best: Zulawski frames
a super nasty separation to exorcize his own.
Sam Neill plays a well-read, but emotionally weak protagonist here, opposite gorgeous French actress Isabelle Adjani, both of whom are engaged in a maddening tug of war over the custody of their young son following a violent trial separation. Momentarily returning home from a mysterious business trip, Neill's Mark finds proof of his wife's infidelity on a postcard she has received from a mysterious suitor named Heinrich. After confronting his wife Anna with the dire truth, he finds out that she has been with him a few times before and, most importantly, that sex with Heinrich is far better. That is what truly pushes the protagonist over the edge, this sort of overwhelming helplessness that comes over a man when his sexual proficiency is put into question. Now, you'd think that Mark would simply plot to kill Anna, hence removing her once and for all from Heinrich's grasp. But that's not what happens. It would be far too simple for a film of such symbolic and emotional magnitude. What happens instead is that Mark and Anna continue to take care of their kid alternately, with Mark retaining their repulsively modern Berlin apartment and Anna living on her own in a undisclosed location. Such arrangements quickly cause friction, and from that friction emerges the fire of madness, which quickly consumes the two protagonists until death becomes involved. Throw in a few peripheral eccentrics (paramount of which is Heinrich, the self-styled German lover) and you've got a film that's absolutely unique, a rare and very intense experience in madness.
Aside from the humbling beauty of Isabelle Adjani's face (which is featured prominently in screen-wide close-ups),
Possession's
most salient, and most expressive feature is the brilliant camerawork by Andrzej Jaroszewicz, a frequent collaborator to director Zulawski*. His camera is so incredibly volatile here that it manages to fully immerse the viewer in a world that is constantly shifting and constantly menaced by the lingering presence of madness. Using hovering or cyclical tracking shots, as well as canted angles to create a warped sense of space, we are quick to share the protagonists' sense of emotional disorientation throughout their ordeal. But then, the camera also exists as a lingering, one could even say tormenting presence in both their lives. Its groundless incarnation and constant intrusion into their intimacy makes it akin to madness itself, which menaces to violently intrude into the narrative from any given offscreen space. The camera becomes especially abrasive in its unflinching, often lengthy scrutiny of the characters' worst episodes. During the famous subway scene, in which Adjani is framed with painful proximity during a particularly violent psychotic episode, duration takes a particular significance as it allows us to probe deeper into her pain and more cinematographically into her character. In the end, the film could've eschewed dialogues altogether based solely on the camera's expressive power as a crucial vector in the depiction of madness.
* Jaroszewicz and Zulawski won the Camerimage award for best Polish duo in 2002.
But then there is overacting, which flamboyantly manages to convey both Mark and Anna's hysteria over their separation. There is such passion in that overacting that it soon becomes akin to an infectious disease. Those wall-shattering screams, those endless "AAAAANAAAAAAAAAAAA!!", these are the true expressions of desperate people, people who are literally inflamed by their emotions to the point of insanity. And it gets increasingly worse, until the whole film sinks in a surreal maelstrom made of horny tentacles and casual murder. The two main actors are pushed to such extremes that the film manages to achieve a somewhat miraculous authenticity in its depiction of traumatic love stories. People cut themselves here, they brutally slaughter opponents and casually indulge in the most animalistic behavior that one could expect either Neill or Adjani to. The emotional level of the performances, and hence, of the whole narrative, is elevated to unnatural heights by those performances, heights where only abandonment can seemingly push you.

An actress' worst nightmare: Isabelle Adjani is
pushed to weird extremes in the famous subway scene.
The sharpness of the screenplay and its crunchy dialogue is another worthy feature here and it evolves quite organically from an early scene in which Mark shares a meeting with his shady employers. In this scene, he is seen as perfectly in control, with James Bond's uncanny quickness at repartee. He remains absolutely unflinching while being challenged with tough questions regarding a mysterious new assignment. The reason he dryly invokes in order to elude said assignment is: "family", which turns out to be an harsher assignment still. Momentarily returning home to Berlin, Mark is stripped of his professional mystique and uncomfortably contorted in the mold of married life. As such, he constantly comes at odds with an ice-cold wife who seems increasingly estranged from him. The slow tracking shot over their still bodies lying in bed is quite informative in that regard. Although they are framed side by side, there is a strong sense of distance which manages to seep into the diegesis. The stillness of both bodies, their lack of passion while in bed is absolutely shocking, especially in light of Mark's long absence and the couple's would-be happy reunion.
That is how the archetype of the cold professional à la James Bond is deconstructed along the lines of sexual potency. In the 1960s, Bond was created as a phallic remedy to man's increasing apathy and growing distaste for war. Thus his sexual potency and ruthless womanizing were key to making him the man that he is. His relationship with Ursula Andress' character from
Dr. No is perhaps the first test of this "fortified" manhood that Fleming's character soon came to embody. To paraphrase Jonny Lee Miller's Sick Boy from
Trainspotting, "Andress [is] the quintessential Bond girl. [...] The embodiment of
his superiority over
us. Beautiful, exotic, highly sexual and totally unavailable to anyone apart from
him (emphasis added)." In this regard, Isabelle Adjani's character could thus be understood as the Bond girl who is slowly slipping away from the protagonist's grasp, a "prize" with a will of her own, and a desire to get out of it. While she first exists as a mere
crutch for Mark's flinching ego, a prize made to prove his manhood, she subsequently becomes a
crotch as the whole narrative eventually becomes solely interested in her sexual antics. Simultaneously, Mark's stature is quickly deflated until no semblance of control is left and his manly grasp has all but vanished. And from that confusion, a new modern definition of gender starts to emerge.
Evolving from a slightly impressionistic depiction of separation, with the lingering presence of madness expressed by the volatile camera, the film eventually sinks into a world of unrestrained symbolism and damaging imagery. Both protagonists end up being doubled and replaced by their better halves. First, Mark creates a docile version of his wife in the person of blonde school attendant Helen. The young woman is eager to help him out with the kid and to provide kind words. She shares all the beauty of his former wife, but without Anna's sharp edge. She would be an ideal partner if only we knew for sure that she was true. As for Anna's own fantasy lover, he seems to have emerged out of her primordial lust and uncontrolled passion. He is a dark version of Mark, with a sharp penetrating look. He seems to have all the sexual resolve which his counterpart lacks. Like Heinrich before him, he is a bothersome reminder of the protagonist's impotence.
But then, the film also draws from Japanese imagery to better depict the sexual angst at the center of the narrative. Isolated in a dilapidated apartment in the sketchier parts of the city, one that stands squarely for her own decaying state of mind, Anna indulges in casual sex with a viscous tentacled creature. At the height of its power, once it has been fully formed and thoroughly wrapped around Adjani's porcelain-white limbs, it becomes the epitome of the Japanese rapist, an entity oozing sexual power and putting the surrounding males at shame. It is Zulawski's contribution to Hokusai's woodcut depicting the dream of the fisherman's wife. The uncanny sexual potency of the creature takes all of its sense here, as a fearsome challenge to Mark's own impotence. And the phallic confusion permeating the film remains whole, a powerful testimony to what men fear deep inside of their hearts. The whole weight of the world, the culture of performance, the unbridled expression of manhood and the very expression of passion all limited to sexual proficiency. All within the confines of one author's nightmare, who uses the screen as a means of exorcizing his demons.

Hentai imagery helps us understand the protagonist's
obsession with phallic power.
Possession is a film like no other precisely because it is made to depict one very specific separation. All narrative threads are but spiderweb strands fastened around the protagonist and author's limbs, a testimony to his flickering resolve. But above all,
Possession is a visceral cinematic experience and it is full of unforgettable imagery. If not for the horny octopi, nasty knife wounds, incongruous karate chops, symbolic doubles and decaying city apartments riddled with litter, then you should see it for Isabelle Adjani, an actress whose captivating beauty is a powerful dramatic engine and a narrative goal in itself. At 26, Adjani's features were striking. The refinement of her face perfect. She is the ultimate object of desire. Yet, she is so much more, a fully-fledged dramatic character driven to madness by her ex-husband's own insecurity and overwhelming desire to get her back. Adjani's onscreen presence is actually unforgettable. And that subway scene... a classic cinematic moment that screams to be rediscovered. And if Adjani doesn't do the trick for you, then you can still watch
Possession as a simple expression of the madness that is love. Not unlike
Tokyo Fist, which I previously reviewed on this blog, the present film is a stellar experience in couple therapy, at once a powerful cinematic experience and a cathartic reflection on passion. If you haven't heard about
Possession, then seek it out immediately. It will provide you with many unforgettable memories and an uncontrollable urge to scream: "AAAAAAAANAAAAAAAAAAAA!"
****1/2 Intricate camerawork, hysterical acting and shocking imagery all contribute to this very personal, yet universal depiction of love and passion. A stellar example of an auteur's take on genre cinema and a full-fledged cult classic with international potential.